Impact of prenatal management of multiple pregnancies on perinatal outcomes A five-year observational single-center study.

Main Article Content

Adriel Sarduy Sieres
Alina Isabel Villacreses Cobo
Cecilia Gabriela Pillasagua Cedeño
Leonardo Gonzalez

Abstract

Introduction: The study focused on prenatal care and its relationship with perinatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies at the Gynecological, Obstetric, and Pediatric University Hospital of Guayaquil. A total of 266 multiple pregnancies concluded at the institution were analyzed out of 429 cases received between January 2017 and June 2021.


Methods: We conducted a quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, correlational, retrospective investigation, analyzing prenatal care in multiple pregnancies and its relationship to fetal, perinatal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality at the hospital. We received 429 multiple pregnancies between January 2017 and June 2021. We studied only the 266 cases that concluded their multiple gestation at the institution, regardless of chronicity, identified through the statistics department, operating room, certificates of live births (REVIT), and delivery room, excluding the 163 cases that did not conclude the pregnancy at the hospital.


Results: It was found that 49.6% of the patients received a minimum of 5 prenatal consultations, with an average of 1.58 consultations. Additionally, a significant correlation (p=0.021) was observed between gestational age and receiving prenatal care at the institution, with 58% of preterm cases having no prenatal care and maternal ages between 18 and 35 years more prone to prematurity (p=0.036). On the other hand, it was found that 78.7% of cases where chorionicity was not defined did not receive any ultrasound at the institution, and it was diagnosed in only 51.5% of cases. Chorionicity did not show a statistically significant influence on admission or length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit nor on mortality (p=0.561, p=0.487, p=0.429). However, the performance of ultrasounds, admission, and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit showed a statistically significant relationship with the number of deaths (P=0.0001) in all cases.


Conclusions: Patients with multiple pregnancies receive four times fewer prenatal care visits than recommended, which, combined with insufficient prenatal ultrasound diagnosis, leads to contradictory perinatal management and higher rates of prematurity, admission, and mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sarduy Sieres, A., Villacreses Cobo, A. I. ., Pillasagua Cedeño, C. G., & Gonzalez, L. (2023). Impact of prenatal management of multiple pregnancies on perinatal outcomes: A five-year observational single-center study. Revista Ecuatoriana De Pediatría, 24(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.52011/207
Section
Original Articles

References

Meng X, Yuan P, Gong L, Wang X, Wu T, Wei Y, et al. Forty-five consecutive cases of complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancy treated with microwave ablation: A single-center experience. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(4):293-8.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5423

PMid:30677152

Glinianaia S V., Rankin J, Khalil A, Binder J, Waring G, Sturgiss SN, et al. Prevalence, antenatal management and perinatal outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: a collaborative multicenter study in England, 2000-2013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(2):184-92.

https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19114

PMid:29900612

Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B, Deruelle P, Favre R, Gallot D, et al. Twin pregnancies: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gy-naecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):12-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045

PMid:21277672

Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, Bernard C, Cambourieu D, Flamant C, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intrauterine growth restriction: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021

PMid:26207980

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics S for M-FM. Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;137(6):e145-62.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004397

PMid:34011891

Khalil A, Liu B. Controversies in the management of twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):888-902.

https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22181

PMid:32799348

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Twin and triplet pregnancy. NICE Guidel (NG 137). 2019;(September):1-61.

Gibson JL, Castleman JS, Meher S, Kilby MD. Updated guidance for the management of twin and triplet pregnancies from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance, UK: What's new that may improve perinatal outcomes? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):147-52.

https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13785

PMid:31799724

Orozco-Quinga X, González-Andrade F. Maternal and Perinatal Factors Associated With Twin Pregnancies in Ecuador. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2021;1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2021.12

PMid:33752776

Khalil A, Liu B. Controversies in the management of twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):888-902. doi: 10.1002/uog.22181. Epub 2021 May 21. PMID: 32799348.

Ministerio de Salud Publica. Ecuador. Control prenatal. Guia de practica clinica. Dirección. Quito, Ecuador.

Publica M de S. Manual de evaluacion y categorizacion del riesgo obstetrico en el control prenatal. Quito, Ecuador.: Direccion Nacional de Normatizacion. Plataforma Gubernamental de Desarrollo Social.; 2019. p. 50.

Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Guía de Asistencia Práctica* Embarazo gemelar bicorial. Prog Obs Ginecol. 2016;59(2004):43-57.

Obstetricia. SE de G y. Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Gestación monocorial. Prog Obs Ginecol. 2020;63(2):123-45.

Auqui-Carangui DA, Narvaez-Rueda AM, Sanchez-Centeno PR, Quiroz-Proaño MB. Embarazo Gemelar Biamniótico Bicoriónico con Restricción del Crecimiento Intrauterino Grado III G1. Reporte de un caso. Medicina (B Aires). 2020;6:12.

Chen H, Wan Y, Xi H, Su W, Cheng J, Zhu C, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dizygotic twin pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization versus spontaneous conception: A retrospective study. PeerJ. 2019;2019(4):1-11.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6638

PMid:30972247 PMCid:PMC6448552

Chen Wu X. Gestación múltiple. Rev Medica Sinerg. 2018;3(5):14-9.

https://doi.org/10.31434/rms.v3i5.122

Townsend R, Khalil A. Ultrasound screening for complications in twin pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2018;23(2):133-41. Availa-ble from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.008

PMid:29467101

Townsend R, Khalil A. Ultrasound screening for complications in twin pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2018;23(2):133-41. Availa-ble from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.008

PMid:29467101

Guevara EDG. Diagnóstico ecográfico de la corionicidad y amnionicidad en el embarazo múltiple. Rev Peru Investig Matern Perinat. 2019;4(1):46-50.

https://doi.org/10.33421/inmp.21543

CENETEC, Secretaría de Salud C. Evidencias y Recomendaciones. Catálogo Maest CENETEC [Internet]. 2016;1:1-41. Available from: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/descargas/gpc/CatalogoMaestro/007_GPC_CirculacionArtPerif/IMSS_007_08_EyR.pdf%0A

CENETEC. GPC Evidencias y Recomendaciones. Cenetec [Internet]. 2009;59. Available from: http://www.cenetec.salud.gob.mx/descargas/gpc/CatalogoMaestro/141_GPC_HEMOFILIA_PEDIATRICA/Imss_ER.pdf

Recolecta UA de. Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social. Inst Guatem Segur Soc [Internet]. 2018;47:1. Available from: https://uardigital.cl/courses/course-v1:UAR+LPQV01+2020_1S/about

Leanne Bricker, MB.BCh, MRCOG C in F and MM. Optimal antena-tal care for twin and triplet pregnancy: The evidence base. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014;28(2):305-17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.12.006

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.12.006

PMid:24412490

Instituto Mexicano del seguro social. Diagnóstico y manejo del Embarazo múltiple. 2013;14.

Goncé A, Boguña J, Muñoz M, Montse P, Bennasar M, Crovetto F. Asistencia al embarazo y parto de gestaciones múltiples. Hosp Clínic,Hospital St Joan Déu, Univ Barcelona. 2015;(Dc):1-23.

Berceanu C, Mehedinţu C, Berceanu S, Voicu NL, Brătilă E, Istrate-Ofiţeru AM, Navolan DB, Niculescu M, Szasz FA, Căpitănescu RG, Văduva CC. Morphological and ultrasound findings in multiple pregnancy placentation. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018;59(2):435-453. PMID: 30173248.

Gynecologists, Royal College of Obstetricians and GG. Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 51. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;124(1):e1-45.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14188

PMid:27862859

Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):247-63.

https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15821

PMid:26577371

Ortiz C, Mendoza Cl. Ministerio de Salud Pública Viceministerio de Atención Integral en Salud Subsecretaría de Atención de Salud Móvil, Hospitalaria y Centros Especializados. 2023;2-5.